Syntactic Ambiguity Element
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59675/S116الكلمات المفتاحية:
Language, Syntactic Ambiguity, Ambiguity in Context, Morphemeالملخص
In selected sermons, this thesis is about zero affixed terms and how these terms lexically cause uncertainty. In texts and speeches, especially sermons, it is an effort to stress the meaning of the love of certain types of terms. We mean those words with zero affixed words derived without addition, i.e., words with double sense, such as a dream verb and a noun. From the text in which they happen, their significance is guessed. The paper provides a thorough analysis of these words and how they arouse uncertainty between the addresses when any sermon is delivered and contain few words of double significance. It also involves a detailed study of a category of words in some selected sermons; to get a general sense of the lexical ambiguity of these terms, these sermons were from different topics. Furthermore, the thesis has numerous sections on the theoretical context of the zero morph terms and the practical side of reviewing these terms as they appear next to an appendix in the sermons, which includes the chosen sermons. Finally, the paper has come up with the conclusions. In the three sermons selected for the current analysis, there are 42 zero affixed words. 17 of them came as nouns and 19 came as verbs, 6 as adjectives and 2 as adverbs. Zero related terms are used rather than other classes of sermons as verbs. Many of these verbs are regular. The rest of the verbs in the sermons were in the imperative's mood and active voice. Some of the verbs were in the indicative mood and the past tense. The adjectives are frequently complex.
المراجع
Aronoff, mark , fudeman, kristen . 2005. What is morphology (fundamentals of linguistics). Blackwell publishing: u.s.a.
Axelsen, Micheal. (2000)."Information Request Ambiguity and End User Query". An unpublished MA thesis. Brisbane: University of Queensland.
Hamdan, A. H. E., & Qais, L. (2016). Analyzing the use of tenses in English news headlines.
Cruse, Allan. (2006). A Glossary of Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Lockwood, David G. 1993. Remarks on derivational morphology. Columbia, Sc: Hornbeam Press.
Lyons, john. (1968). Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge: cambridge university press.
Matushansky, ora ,marantz, alec . 2013. Distributed morphology today. Cambridge : mit press.
Pascoe J. (1998). Understanding and Using Context. Georgia, Georgia Institute of Technology: Future Computing Environments Group.
Pesetsky, david . 1995. Zero syntax: experiencers and cascades (current studies in linguistics). Hong kong: asco typesettings ltd.
Retrieved at October from www.thesaurus.com.
Schilit, B., Adams N., and Want R. (1994) Understanding and Using Context. Georgia, Georgia Institute of Technology: Future Computing Environments Group.
Scholars of the general corporation of Islamic endowments and affairs. 2010. The sermons of Mosques. United Arab Emirates.
Spencer, andrew . 1991. Morphological theory: an introduction to word structure in generative grammar. Oxford : blackwell publishers, ltd
Ullman, Stephan. (1977). Semantics: An Introduction to the Science of Meaning. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Woods, N. (2006). Describing Discourse: A practical Guide to Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press
التنزيلات
منشور
إصدار
القسم
الرخصة
الحقوق الفكرية (c) 2023 Academic International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities
هذا العمل مرخص بموجب Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.